Embassy of
the Russian Federation
in the Republic of South Africa

Chancery
tel: +2712 362-1337
fax: +2712 362-0116
ruspospr@mweb.co.za

Consular Section
tel: +2712 362-7116
fax: +2712 362-7090
pretoria@dks.ru

   RUS

updated 6:26 AM UTC, Jul 24, 2017

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statement and answers to media questions during a joint news conference following talks with Syria’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Walid Muallem, Moscow, June 29, 2015

Ladies and gentlemen,

We are happy to welcome the delegation of the Syrian Arab Republic led by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Walid Muallem to Moscow.

This morning we held substantive talks. We have just returned from the Kremlin, where Minister Muallem was received by President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin. Naturally, attention was focused on the need to step up efforts to overcome the Syrian crisis. As President Putin pointed out, an objective analysis of the current situation and numerous contacts with countries of the region, including Syria’s closest neighbours Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, reveal growing concern both in the region and beyond over the terrorist activities of the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) and other radical groups practicing violent extremism.

We are convinced – as President Putin has called for – that all countries of the region should put aside the difference they have always had and, in all probability, will continue to have on certain matters, and concentrate instead on fighting our common threat – terrorism.

That would mark a very important next step towards a political consensus, following the statement adopted by the Group of Eight two years ago, in June 2013, when during its summit in Northern Ireland it urged the Syrian government and the Syrian opposition to team up against terrorists and drive them out of the country. This objective remains as relevant as ever, but considering the scale of the activities of ISIS and its accomplices, efforts by Syrians alone are not enough. That’s why we are calling on all countries of the region to coordinate their actions in combating this horrible threat. That doesn’t mean, of course, that we are postponing the other tasks stipulated by the Geneva Communiqué of June 30, 2012, above all the need to establish a political dialogue led by Syrians themselves with a view to promoting agreements that reflect the common accord between all the Syrian groups.

In the past two years, Russia has invariably advocated for the implementation of the Geneva Communique. This central document was endorsed by the UN Security Council upon our initiative, although not immediately, as at first our Western partners were reluctant to do so. Subsequently, we tried to contribute to the preparations for the resumption of the negotiating process. We held two meetings in Moscow, which allowed the Syrian Government and different opposition groups that were oriented towards a constructive dialogue to accommodate general principles aimed at preserving Syria as a sovereign, territorially integral and independent state that would ensure the rights of all ethnic, religious and other groups.

We coordinated our efforts with other countries, such as Egypt, which were also willing to facilitate the formation of conditions for the resumption of official talks on the Syrian settlement.

The two Moscow meetings produced a package of principles. We would like to continue helping, primarily the Syrians, specify the ideas and approaches set forth in these principles. To facilitate this process and prepare solid ground for the resumption of talks, we are prepared to consider the opportunity to host a third series of consultations in Moscow. We discussed this today as well with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem.

All of these steps should help Staffan de Mistura, the UN special envoy for Syria, who is involved in intensive consultations, to lay the foundation for the negotiating process that can only be comprehensive and involve all Syrian groups, without exception.

As I said, the Geneva Communique of June 30, 2012 is a firm foundation for these efforts, although obviously this problem required enhanced attention, considering the unprecedented growth of the terrorist threat. We hope that Mr Mistura will do this.

Let me emphasise again that the task of the international community, including the neighbours of Syria, European countries, Russia, the United States and the UN is not to impose something on the Syrians, but to create the conditions for inclusive dialogue whereby they would be able to reach a consensus among themselves.

Today we also discussed conditions of bilateral relations — in part, the implementation of the agreements reached last October during a regular session of the Inter-Governmental Trade and Economic Commission.

Russia – as President Vladimir Putin reaffirmed today – will continue supporting Syrians and their leaders in the efforts to resolve socio-economic issues during the current crisis and build up their defences for countering the terrorist threat.

We are pleased with the open and traditionally friendly nature of our meetings today and will continue supporting Syrians during this time of trial.

Question (to both ministers): Contacts at different levels are taking place in the region; in part, Syria on the backdrop of the mounting terrorist threat. Are we entering a new phase of the Syrian settlement? What about potential contacts between the Syrian leaders and their counterparts in regional powers, such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey?

Sergey Lavrov: Let historians use the notions of a “new phase,” or a “new stage” when they describe what is happening. We are focused on practical policy, which requires that we should suspend as soon as possible everything that does not concern the anti-terrorist struggle and concentrate our common efforts on countering ISIS, Jabhat al-Nusra and other similar groups. As I said, today we have a bit more objective conditions for this because all countries of the region – and not only them – realise the scale of the threat. ISIS is spilling into Afghanistan and looking at Central Asia. As many testimonies show, acts of terror in Europe are also directly linked with ISIS. Therefore, the common awareness of global danger should prevail over individual geopolitical schemes and unilateral goals. Differences may be settled by way of dialogue but it is difficult to hold a dialogue on disputable issues when the existence of these states is threatened by terrorists who want to turn them into their caliphate. As you know, this goal has been proclaimed and is shared by many extremist groups from Pakistan to Nigeria.

So, let’s talk about a “new stage” later; now we want to continue our meticulous efforts on reaching an accord. Maybe there will not be a coalition in the classic meaning of this word, but it is absolutely necessary to coordinate action with all of the fighters against the terrorist threat.

Question: Russia’s political efforts to settle the Syrian crisis make it clear that the efficiency of Geneva-3 will be jeopardised without a third Moscow meeting. What practical steps can be made in this area, especially considering the sharp growth in terrorist activities in the north and south of Syria due in part to the financial support and arms supplies by neighbouring countries?

Sergey Lavrov: I would be so adamant as to say that Geneva-3 will come under threat without Moscow-3. The venue of consultations does not matter at all. The main thing is to draw conclusions from the failure of Geneva-2. It failed because our Western partners and some regional countries placed their bets on one group alone, notably the so-called National Coalition. It was proclaimed (by the Arab League among others) to be the only lawful representative of the entire Syrian people. They ignored numerous opposition groups that occupied patriotic rather than aggressive positions and advocated political settlement. It is important for us to redress this mistake and I think that we are doing this – opposition groups are beginning to unite as the result of two Moscow meetings, a meeting in Cairo and the efforts of several other countries.

The success of the Moscow-2 meeting in April was that its participants – representatives of the Syrian Government and the majority of opposition groups – agreed on a document that spells out the principles for preserving and developing the Syrian state in the interests of all of the ethnic and religious communities that have lived in Syria for centuries and even millennia. As my colleague and friend, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, said, the document is not specific enough – it is necessary to specify many provisions that are formulated in its principles. We would like to be helpful but only Syrians can do this. Russia believes that opposition groups that did not come to Moscow but were present in Cairo should be involved in the work in these principles. Russia and Egypt are active enough in coordinating their actions in the hope that eventually all opposition groups will be represented at the talks with the Syrian Government based on the Geneva Communique. Let me emphasise again that this document provides for the need to reach a consensus on the way to live in a common state.

As for external players, they should avoid any action that does not facilitate the formation of these conditions and political settlement. All statements about the regime’s replacement harbor high risks. They contradict the Geneva Communique and, regrettably, play into the hands of extremists, which all of us would like to avoid.

Let me repeat that now we have the grounds to say that the former assessments are subject to change, although certain inertia will probably still be there. Russia would like to help – at the current meeting as well – external players realise that the main threat that goes far beyond unilateral political projects emanates from terrorism.

I would like to emphasise again that this is not today’s improvisation. Since the start of the so-called Arab Spring, we have consistently stated during all of our contacts with our partners that it is necessary to stop ignoring the enormous threat emanating from violent extremism. We are stating that it is dangerous to flirt with radicals and extremists for the sake of short-term opportunistic objectives. There are plenty of examples in history when such flirtations had grievous consequences and fired back as a deadly and bloody boomerang.

Let me recall that last week President Vladimir Putin discussed this issue with US President Barrack Obama over the phone, emphasising that the prevention of ISIS’s extremist plans falls within the common interests of Russia, the United States and all other countries. The Russian and American presidents instructed Secretary of State John Kerry and me to immediately hold a meeting on sharing opinions on the best ways to pool the efforts of our two countries and regional states. Taking due account of today’s talks, our delegations will head for Vienna where a meeting with Kerry is planned for tomorrow. We will inform you in detail about the course of these talks.

Sergey Lavrov (adds after Wallid Muallem’s comment): Walid, I will tell you as your friend that we will deal with practical issues rather than rhetoric. We will work for the adoption of practical common actions. We can engage in rhetoric when we overcome terrorism.

Comment by the Information and Press Department of the Russian MFA on the 70th Anniversary of UN Charter

Seventy years ago in San Francisco, representatives of 50 countries signed the United Nations Charter. The UN Charter, which was the result of the great victory over Nazism, provides the code of conduct for the international community as well as the foundation for the constantly evolving and extensive system of international treaties and agreements.

The UN Charter stipulates the basic principles of contemporary international law and interstate relations – the sovereign equality of countries, non-interference in internal affairs, and the peaceful resolution to disputes – which helped create a workable mechanism for global governance through the coordination of many countries’ stances. The Charter thus contained the key principles of the modern polycentric international system.

We are confident that only by joining forces to respond to the key challenges of our time will the international community be able to progress toward achieving the ambitious goals proclaimed in the Charter – to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, to maintain international peace and security, to develop friendly relations among nations, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, to cooperate in addressing economic, social, cultural and humanitarian problems on a global scale with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without discrimination by race, sex, language or religion.

Vladimir Putin’s Speech and subsequent QA at the plenary session of the 19th St Petersburg International Economic Forum

The session’s motto was Time to Act: Joint Efforts for Stability and Growth.

June 19, 2015, 16:45, St Petersburg

KASddyt0YVWlOAwAEoogVnMw9WwpxIBJ.jpg

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, friends,

It is a pleasure to welcome you all to this International Economic Forum in St Petersburg, a city which throughout its history has always been a symbol of Russia’s openness and desire to draw on the best of world practice, cooperate, and move forward together.

First of all, I would like to thank all of the politicians and businesspeople attending this forum for their interest and confidence in our country. Ladies and gentlemen, friends, we see in you serious long-term partners, and it is for this reason that, as is tradition, we always speak with frankness and trust at the St Petersburg Forum about our achievements and new possibilities, and also, of course, about the problems and difficulties we encounter, and the tasks we are still working on.

I saw many of you here a year ago. Over this last year, the global and Russian economies have changed, and in some areas, these changes have been very dramatic. Russia’s economy now faces restricted access to the global capital market, and then there is the drop in prices for our main export goods, and the small decrease in consumer demand, which had previously been an impetus for economic growth. True – here, I agree with the participants in the yesterday’s discussions at the forum – demand is starting to recover again now.

Looking at energy prices, on which our economy is still very dependent, unfortunately, I remind you that the average price for Urals brand oil in 2013 was $107.9 a barrel. In 2014, it dropped to $97.6 and over January-May this year, was at $56 a barrel. According to Rosstat [Russian Statistics Agency], Russia’s GDP contracted by 2.2 percent in the first quarter of 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, and industrial output was down by 1.5 percent over January-April 2015.

What I want to note, however, is that by the end of last year, as you know very well, people were predicting that we were in for a very deep crisis. This has not happened. We have stabilised the situation, absorbed the negative short-term fluctuations, and are now making our way forward confidently through this difficult patch. We can do this above all because our economy had already built up sufficient reserves to give it the inner solidity it needs. We still have a positive trade balance and our non-raw materials exports are increasing.

Let me give a few examples to illustrate these words. Physical volumes of non-raw materials exports increased by 17 percent over the first quarter of 2015, and exports of high value-added goods came to nearly $7 billion in the first quarter, which is up by nearly 6 percent in value terms and by 15 percent in terms of the physical volumes.

We have kept inflation under control. Yes, it did spike following the ruble’s devaluation, but this trend then slackened off. We saw prices go up quite sharply over the first three months of the year (by 3.9 percent in January, 2.2 percent in February, and 1.2 percent in March), but in April, inflation rose by only 0.5 percent. That the trend is decreasing now is clear. We can see this.

Our budget is stable. Our financial and banking systems have adapted to the new conditions and we have succeeded in stabilising the exchange rate and holding on to our reserves. Let me stress too that we did not resort to any restrictions on the free movement of capital, just as was the case in 2008 and 2009.

The federal budget deficit in January-May 2015 came to 1.48 trillion rubles, which represents 3.6 percent of our GDP. We expect that the deficit will reach 3.7 percent of GDP for the year as a whole. This is in line with the budget law currently in force.

Our gold and currency reserves, which I just mentioned, come to more than $300 billion. I was speaking with Elvira Nabiullina [Governor of the Central Bank] just before, and, according to my information, our reserves came to $361.6 billion as of June 5. They are very slightly lower now, because some money has been used.

At the same time, the Government Reserve Fund came to $76.25 billion or 5.5 percent of our GDP as at June 1, 2015. Our second reserve fund, the National Welfare Fund, had reserves of $75.86 billion, again, 5.5 percent of GDP.

We have prevented a jump in unemployment, which currently stands at 5.8 percent of the active population. I remind you that during the 2008–2009 crisis, the unemployment rate rose to 8.3 percent. The imposition of sanctions forced us to considerably step up our import replacement efforts. We have made significant progress in a number of areas and have achieved some notable results. We have tremendous potential in our engineering and petrochemicals sectors, in light industry, the processing sector, pharmaceuticals, and a number of other sectors. Our agriculture sector’s results are a clear example of what we can achieve.

Of course, we still have a lot of work to do in this sector too, but our dairy production, for example, was up by 3.6 percent over January-April 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. Production of butter increased by 8.7 percent, cheese by slightly more than 29 percent, fish and fish products by 6 percent, and meat by 12–13 percent. The import replacement programme’s aim is not to close our market and isolate ourselves from the global economy. We need to learn how to produce quality, competitive goods that will be in demand not just here in Russia, but on the global markets too. Ultimately, our goal is to make fuller and more effective use of our internal resources to resolve our development tasks.

Let me repeat the point that we are responding to the restrictions imposed from outside not by closing off our economy, but by expanding freedom and making Russia more open. This is not a slogan; this is the substance of our actual policies and of the work that we are doing today to improve the business environment, find new partners, open up new markets, and take part in big integration projects. I note that more than 60 companies with foreign participation have started up practical operations in Russia over just this last year alone. Right now, while this forum is taking place, several companies are opening their doors, including here in St Petersburg. There is a pharmaceuticals company, a company producing gas turbines as a joint venture with foreign partners, and so on.

I want to thank all of our partners who, despite the current political problems, continue to work in Russia, invest their capital and technology, and establish new businesses and create new jobs here. Friends, thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen,

The timely measures that we took to support our economy and financial system have worked overall. Now, we are once again concentrating our focus on resolving the systemic tasks on our long-term development agenda. Our task is to ensure sustainable growth, make our economy more effective, raise labour productivity, and bring in new investment. Our priorities are to improve the business climate, train the specialists we need for the economy and public administration, and education and technology. I would like to say a few more words about each of these issues.

Let me start with improving the business climate and making Russia’s jurisdiction more competitive. Our aim is to offer the freest and most predictable and favourable conditions and opportunities for investors. We want to make it profitable to invest in Russia. We set the firm goal for the coming four years of settling tax rates that will remain stable and not increasing the tax burden on business so that companies can plan their work for the medium term.

We will stick to these decisions no matter what the external situation or the burden on our budget. You can see from the figures I cited just before that our reserves are sufficient for us to be able to carry out these policies. At the same time, we are creating new incentives for new developing companies. In this respect, let me remind you that we decided to introduce tax holidays for individual entrepreneurs, offer small and medium-sized business special tax regimes that significantly reduce their tax burdens, and give tax breaks to greenfield industrial companies.

Yesterday, I discussed with the heads of our industrial companies a number of issues that we most certainly do face. The proposal was made to offer tax breaks of this kind not just to greenfield projects, but to all new investment. We will certainly examine these proposals. Let me add, that capital and assets returning to Russia from abroad are also exempted from tax payments, and their owners are fully guaranteed from any kind of prosecution.

At the same time, we will take steps to make Russian companies and their offices abroad more transparent. We have already made the necessary amendments to our laws. Let me stress that these provisions are fully in keeping with the decisions made by the G20, FATF and other international organisations.

Furthermore, as part of our national entrepreneurial initiative, we have thoroughly updated the federal laws regulating conditions for doing business. The authorities and the regulatory and supervisory agencies are changing their approach to working with businesspeople. It is becoming more comprehensible, open and transparent. Let me note that starting in 2016, small businesses that have never had any serious violations of the rules in the past will be freed from inspections for a three-year period.

We realise, of course, that for our national jurisdiction to be competitive, we need to keep moving ahead and make constant improvements. At the same time, we also need to analyse the effectiveness of the measures we have already taken. This makes it particularly important to have effective channels for getting feedback from business. I therefore ask the Agency for Strategic Initiatives and the main business associations to analyse how the laws are enforced and study the best practice around the world, and if need be, propose new decisions.

The national regional investment climate rating also has a very big part to play. The rating is not a goal in itself of course, but will provide a working instrument for identifying and spreading best practice in the regions to the country as a whole. Incidentally, the initiative to develop this rating came from our main business associations. What distinguishes this project is that the businesspeople themselves assess the state of the business climate, the quality of public administration and so on.

More than 200,000 businesspeople throughout Russia have taken part in the surveys this year. Some of the positive examples have already been mentioned during the discussions here, but I would like to take the opportunity to name them once again. I think this is worth it. They include Kaluga Region, Tatarstan, Belgorod Region, Tambov Region, Ulyanovsk Region, Krasnodar Territory, Rostov Region, Kostroma Region, Republic of Chuvashia, and Tula Region. As I said, this rating will be a tool for helping to improve the quality of management at all levels of power. This is one of the key areas for our development today.

In this regard, the first point I want to make is that we need to develop a whole class of public administrators who know how to work flexibly, take a modern approach, and understand business’ needs when it comes to the business climate and the public administration system overall. A mechanism for ongoing improvement of public management personnel will be one of the most important steps in work in this area. We also plan to establish a centre for exchanging best practice in public administration and developing the business climate in the regions at one of our top universities. This centre will be a good platform not just for improving qualifications, but also for exchanging experience, coming up with new ideas, and developing horizontal ties between the members of different regional management teams.

Second, I think it would be a good idea to set up special headquarters – project offices, if you will – in each region. They will become a kind of managing office for development, helping to introduce the best mechanisms for creating a favourable investment climate. A comfortable business environment is one of the essential conditions for developing a mass of small and medium-sized businesses working in the non-raw materials sectors. This is a real road forward to economic diversification and job creation.

Our goal is for small and medium-sized businesses to conquer the domestic market and develop their export potential. We will therefore develop close coordination between the institutions for supporting industry and stimulating exports. They include the recently set up Industrial Development Fund, the Far East Development Fund, the Russian Direct Investment Fund, project financing mechanisms, and also the Russian Export Centre, where Russian companies can receive a whole range of services to support their goods on markets abroad.

Also, following a proposal from the business community, we are setting up a corporation to develop small and medium-sized business. Businesses will be able to obtain all of the necessary financial, legal and methodological support, including help in getting access to public procurement tenders and tenders by state-owned enterprises. Essentially, we are consolidating the support mechanisms for small and medium-sized business and we hope that this will bring us real results.

Friends, anyone who wants to take the lead in the world today has to put their focus on leaders in business, management, and, of course, developing technology and education. We have done a lot to strengthen our country’s scientific and technology resource base, bolster cooperation between the scientific community, the education sector, and industry, and get new developments into practical implementation in actual production.

Over the near future, we will undertake an extensive technological upgrading of our companies in the raw materials and non-raw materials sectors and in agriculture. From 2019, a new technical regulation system and strict environmental standards will encourage gradual transition to the best available technology. Essentially, companies will be required by law to modernise and carry out ongoing technological development. One of our most important tasks today is to give our companies incentives to invest in developing technology here in Russia. I ask the Government to propose additional decisions in this area.

We also need to make an inventory of the current mechanisms for supporting applied research and getting new developments into practical use. We need to look at how the incentives, including tax breaks, are working. As for the development institutions, they need to focus clearly on facilitating our technological modernisation efforts.

We are launching projects that will provide our companies with a powerful technological resource base not just for today but also for tomorrow. Our technological planning horizons are broadening substantially. Russian companies must take key positions in sectors and markets that will shape the economic future and the way of life of people in 20–30 years’ time, like the way the IT sector has dramatically changed our own lives over these last 20 years.

To achieve these goals, we have launched the national technology initiative, with the participation of prominent scientists and the high-tech business sector. This is a long-term project, of course, but within the next 2–3 years, we should already have new scientific laboratories, new companies, and educational programmes for training personnel able to handle the most modern tasks and work with the latest technology.

There is another very important area I want to mention. At the recent congress held by Delovaya Rossiya, one of our biggest business associations, the idea came up of organising an effective system for foreign technology transfers. We have successful experience of foreign technology transfers in the pharmaceuticals, automotive, and consumer goods manufacturing industries. It is important to give this work a systemic basis and get the development institutions’ resources involved. I ask the Government and the business associations to draft specific additional proposals on this matter, including on establishing the optimum format for cooperation between the authorities and business in the area of technology transfers.

We realise, of course, that the quality of our education system will play a decisive part in developing our country and making it more competitive. Our colleagues from foreign investment companies, who I met with yesterday, said the same thing. Training for specialists must prepare them not only for today’s demands but also take into account the best global practice and the development prospects for new technology and markets.

Our young people, students and schoolchildren, have won the most prestigious competitions in technical and scientific fields. To give just one very recent example, students from St Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics have proven repeatedly that they are unrivalled in the world today. This year, the university’s team once again confirmed its absolute leadership and was a long way ahead of the world’s top programming schools. The university’s team is the only team in the world to have won the student programming championships six times. I want to congratulate the team once again on this success.

A lot depends, of course, on the heads of the universities. We need new leaders here, people with deep knowledge of production, people who know industry’s needs and follow the technological development trends. Our companies propose that we build up a reserve of management personnel for universities training our engineering and technical specialists. I think this is a good proposal and we should carry it out. At the same time, the business community should be more active in universities’ supervisory boards and boards of trustees and should work closely with teaching staff and take part in their training and ongoing education programmes. This is in business’ own interests.

Modernising and improving the quality of secondary vocational education and giving it stronger links to actual production are very important tasks. Many regions are already actively implementing with success a programme of dual education that combines time spent in actual companies with theoretical training. It is no coincidence that the regions that have made the greatest progress in developing their secondary vocational education systems are also the leaders in the regional rating and overall are demonstrating rapid socioeconomic growth.

The engineering professions and the trades require very high levels of skills today. This requires us to develop a modern system of professional standards. The employers and business associations are also playing a big part in this work through the Presidential National Council for Skills and Qualifications.

I think we need to summarise our experience, combine our efforts and build an integral system for training personnel, taking the best world practice into consideration. This system should cover every link, from additional education opportunities for developing children’s skills in technical fields, to secondary vocational education, higher education in engineering, and national and international competitions for the various trades.

Another important areas of our work for the coming years is developing mechanisms for accompanying and supporting talented children so as to help them develop their potential in full and achieve success here at home, in Russia. As you know, we are launching one such project. It is underway now in Sochi. This is the Sochi centre for children from throughout the country who show exceptional talent in sport, the arts, and science. This will be another important part of the Sochi Olympic legacy.

The global economic development map is changing literally before our eyes. Asia-Pacific Region nations such as China, Japan, South Korea and ASEAN nations already account for one quarter of the global economy. Over the next decade, it is these markets that will become the primary source of growth in global demand for goods and services. With all the fluctuations occurring in the world – political and economic – this trend is inevitable. It makes sense that together with our Eurasian Economic Union partners, we strive to improve ties with the APR, eliminating barriers to trade and investment. This year, the Eurasian Economic Union signed its first free-trade zone agreement with Vietnam. Russian companies will be able to supply a whole range of goods duty free.

We are broadening our cooperation with the People’s Republic of China in the interest of creating a common economic space. This May, we signed a joint statement on combining the development of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Silk Road Economic Belt. In essence, we are talking about new approaches to cooperation between the Eurasian Economic Union and China, about broadening cooperation and implementing major joint infrastructure projects, about simplifying trade, and strengthening cooperation through various financial instruments.

Strengthening partnership with APR states is a highly important element of our work to develop Russia’s Far East. We are creating the most free and comfortable conditions possible for placing capital and launching production. Investors will get unique opportunities to work on the Russian market and, importantly, a good base for direct access to the broad, growing APR market. Even now, priority development areas are being created in the Far East with a whole range of tax and other benefits.

We are launching a system of state support for major investment projects. At the same time, we are prepared to offer even more flexible and advanced mechanisms. The Government has already prepared a draft law on creating a free port in Vladivostok. The draft law applies to all key ports in Primorye, from Zarubino to Nakhodka, and 13 districts that are home to about 75% of the territory’s residents.

Free port residents will receive ample benefits. These are not just tax benefits, but also a simplified visa regime, the implementation of a free customs zone, and simplified border control procedures. This September, the first Eastern Economic Forum will be held in Vladivostok, which will include a detailed presentation of our proposals to foreign investors.

I want to repeat again that we strive to cooperate with everyone – everyone who is ready to work on the basis of equality and mutual respect, and wants to implement mutually beneficial projects. I am confident that the trade and economic partnership with Latin American nations and BRICS states also holds enormous potential. The BRICS summit coming up in early July in Russia will certainly contribute to broadening our business contacts.

I want to stress that active cooperation with the new centres of global growth does not in any way mean that we intend to give less attention to the dialogue with our traditional western partners. I am confident that this cooperation will certainly continue.

Ladies and gentlemen, Russia is open to the world, to economic, scientific and humanitarian cooperation, and contacts with civil society and business representatives from around the world. I am confident that this policy, this dialogue, is in our common interest and it will help maintain the trust that serves as the foundation for our work together.

We face major challenges and we will develop, enter new markets, create modern technology, and implement large-scale projects. We will do it together with entrepreneurs, citizens and new leaders who are ready to work for Russia and for its development. That is why we are absolutely sure of our success.

Thank you for your attention.

American television talk show host and journalist Charlie Rose: We will have an in-depth discussion on a number of economic issues that were raised with our business representatives.

Mr President, I would like to begin by saying that it is a pleasure to be here in your home city, the place where you began your political career. This is also a historically important city – Russia was born here as an empire. This is a very important place.

There are some very serious issues that can be resolved only if Russia takes action, if you take part. We are talking about economic policy, foreign policy, Ukraine, the Baltic states, Europe, Syria, Iran, China, and Russia. There are very many questions, there are problems, and there are conflicts. Russia has to play its part in finding solutions to many problems. There is the issue of borders, the issue of Russia and Ukraine. Could you help us understand as you see it: where are we? How did we get there and where do we go from here?

Vladimir Putin: First, I would like to thank you for agreeing to work with us today and moderate this meeting. This forum is called the St Petersburg International Economic Forum. I would like us to focus on economic issues. However, I would agree with you that without resolving a number of acute critical situations it is hard to move along in the economic sphere.

Read more ...

On the passing away of Yevgeny Primakov, a prominent Russian statesman and diplomat

primakov1991

1929-2015

Yevgeny Primakov died on 26 June of 2015 at the age of 85. He was an outstanding political, government and public figure of our time, a world famous Russian politician and diplomat who was Prime Minister of Russia in the dire period from 1998 to 1999.

 Mr. Primakov also served as a Foreign Minister in 1996-1998. He is widely regarded as the person who made a significant contribution towards laying the foundations of Russia’s current foreign policy, increasing its prestige and influence on the global arena. It was he who as a true visionary first formulated and defined the principle of multipolarity. This concept has withstood the test of time and today it is clear that there are no alternatives.

 Mr. Primakov was also a prominent expert on Middle Eastern politics, an academician and a member of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

   

President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin on the death of Yevgeny Primakov: Mr Primakov was an outstanding statesman, talented scholar, and wise and charismatic diplomat. He made a tremendous contribution to modern Russia’s development. His enormous professionalism and management experience, deep knowledge and analytical mind, ability to persuade and firmness of character always found their place and use in the most responsible and difficult areas of work. No matter in what post, he always found effective solutions to the tasks at hand, and was dedicated to his work and to his homeland.

 

Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev expressed his condolences over the death of Yevgeny Primakov: The death of Yevgeny Primakov is a great loss. Yevgeny Primakov was a respected statesman, an outstanding scientist-orientalist, a bright and extraordinary man. People who worked with him, paid tribute to his erudition, diplomatic talent and exceptional performance. We will always remember Yevgeny Primakov.

 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed his condolences over the death of Yevgeny Primakov: Yevgeny Primakov is dead. It is very difficult to find the right words, but it is impossible to ignore the scope of this personality – a great man, statesman, politician, journalist, scholar and commentator. Whatever he did and wherever fate sent him, he was the best everywhere, he was the first everywhere. We will miss him dearly

 

Please send your messages of condolence to the following email: ruspospr@mweb.co.za

 

brics new  mgimo en  rt english  Russian Embassy in South Africa wbhrua-ru  rao cis  SPIEF17   rossot  gpw belarus  mgimo globalaffairs  BRICS fin eng

 

Main Menu